Conducting mass balance and supplier checks under CoC v6.1

Learn how to perform mass balance calculations and supplier authentication under GLOBALG.A.P. Chain of Custody v6.1 rules.

By 4Auditee4 min read
Conducting mass balance and supplier checks under CoC v6.1
On this page
  1. Regulatory scope and mandatory supplier authentication
  2. Mass balance calculation methodology and loss verification
  3. Managing delivery discrepancies and reporting fraud
  4. Comparison of CoC v6.1 input verification and mass balance rules
  5. What to do now
  6. Reference documents

The short version

  • Supply chain companies must systematically authenticate direct supplier GGNs or CoC Numbers in GLOBALG.A.P. IT systems.
  • Products delivered without valid supplier certification details must be immediately relabeled and handled as noncertified.
  • Documented mass balance calculations verify that certified output quantities never exceed certified inputs minus conversion losses.
  • Companies must maintain an up-to-date list of verified conversion loss rates for every intermediate processing step.

Regulatory scope and mandatory supplier authentication

Supply chain companies taking legal ownership or physical control of certified agricultural products must comply with the GLOBALG.A.P. Chain of Custody version 6.1 standard. The standard enforces strict input and output controls to prevent uncertified commodities from entering certified supply streams. This regulatory framework affects quality managers, compliance leads, warehouse supervisors, and internal auditors operating across processing, packing, trading, and distribution facilities.

Control Point CoC-SC 2.1 mandates that companies establish a documented procedure to systematically authenticate direct suppliers before or during ownership transfer. Compliance requires validating the supplier GLOBALG.A.P. Number or Chain of Custody Number, certificate expiration date, and registered destination countries in GLOBALG.A.P. IT systems. Companies must maintain verification logs demonstrating that supplier certificates were valid when products were purchased or received.

Physical verification complements digital authentication during goods receipt. Under Control Point CoC-SC 2.2, companies must systematically verify that incoming physical products and quantities match delivery notes and purchase orders. In addition, Control Point CoC-SC 1.8 requires maintaining comprehensive purchase and sales records, including purchase agreements, shipping invoices, bills of lading, and receipt inspection logs.

Mass balance calculation methodology and loss verification

Control Point CoC-SC 1.4 establishes the mandatory requirement for a documented mass balance calculation. The mass balance exercise proves that the volume of product sold as certified does not exceed the volume of inputs purchased from verified certified sources. Information regarding incoming, outgoing, intermediate, and stored quantities must be recorded continuously for both certified and noncertified product lines.

The standard defines a specific accounting formula to reconcile physical inventory flows:

  • Certified output calculation: Certified outputs equal certified inputs received minus conversion losses and quantity remaining in storage.
  • Conversion loss tracking: Conversion loss rates and processing yields must be calculated, verified, and recorded for every step between receipt and dispatch.
  • Physical loss parameters: Conversion calculations must incorporate operational waste, physical shrinkage, grading rejections, and returned items.
  • Information system integration: Companies operating automated software capable of real-time mass balance tracking may execute the exercise during self-assessments and external audits.

Managing delivery discrepancies and reporting fraud

Handling delivery discrepancies is governed by Control Point CoC-SC 2.3, which requires a written procedure and dedicated log. When products ordered as certified arrive without the supplier CoC Number or GGN on commercial documents, or fail IT system verification, they must be relabeled immediately as noncertified. These items must be handled as noncertified products until the supplier provides documented corrective evidence restoring certified status.

Control Point CoC-SC 2.4 mandates a formal procedure for reporting suspected supplier fraud to the GLOBALG.A.P. Secretariat. If a supplier certificate cannot be located in the IT system, displays mismatched legal entity details, or shows expired status, the company must file an official complaint. The complaint must include the supplier identifying details, GGN or CoC Number, and supporting commercial documents.

Where trade partners request output verification, Control Point CoC-SC 2.5 requires companies to verify supplier certificate validity in the IT systems prior to dispatch. If a supplier certification status changes from valid during storage to invalid at shipment, the affected products cannot be shipped under a certified claim. Companies must disclose trade partner output verification requests to their certification body and maintain written remedial action procedures.

Comparison of CoC v6.1 input verification and mass balance rules

Control point referenceOperational focusMandatory verification requirementNon-conformance trigger
Control Point CoC-SC 1.4Mass balance accountingCalculate certified outputs as certified inputs minus conversion losses and stored volumeCertified sales exceed certified inputs or conversion loss list is missing
Control Point CoC-SC 2.1Direct supplier authenticationValidate supplier GGN or CoC Number, expiration date, and destination country via IT systemsPurchasing products without logging valid IT system certificate verification
Control Point CoC-SC 2.3Delivery discrepancy handlingRelabel products as noncertified if delivered without supplier GGN or CoC NumberSelling unverified goods as certified after commercial document omissions
Control Point CoC-SC 2.4Fraud complaint filingFile formal complaint with Secretariat when supplier fails IT verification checksOmitting fraud reporting when encountering counterfeit or invalid certificates

What to do now

  • Establish IT verification logs: Implement a routine digital verification protocol to authenticate direct supplier GGNs and CoC Numbers in the GLOBALG.A.P. IT systems before taking ownership.
  • Maintain conversion rate lists: Document realistic conversion loss rates, yields, and shrinkage parameters for every processing and handling stage in your facility.
  • Enforce delivery discrepancy procedures: Instruct incoming goods inspectors to immediately segregate and relabel products delivered without supplier certification details on delivery notes.
  • Implement Secretariat reporting protocols: Create a formal procedure to file complaints with the GLOBALG.A.P. Secretariat whenever supplier credentials fail IT platform authentication.

Reference documents

  • GLOBALG.A.P. Chain of Custody – control points and compliance criteria, v6.1_Nov22, Section CoC-SC 1.4, Section CoC-SC 1.8, Section CoC-SC 2.1, Section CoC-SC 2.2, Section CoC-SC 2.3, Section CoC-SC 2.4, Section CoC-SC 2.5
  • GLOBALG.A.P. Integrated Farm Assurance Smart/GFS – principles and criteria for aquaculture, v6.0_Mar23, Section AQ 28.01.04, Section AQ 28.02
ShareLinkedInEmail

Manage this work in 4Auditee

Keep audit plans, problems, corrective actions and document versions in one place. See the records behind each change and decision.

Book a demo

Get new articles by email

Pick your topics. A short digest every Monday, or each new article as it is published.

You’ll get: GlobalG.A.P. · GlobalG.A.P. · Weekly digest

We email you a link to confirm. Nothing else is sent, and every email lets you unsubscribe. How we handle your address