ISO 9001 Control of Nonconforming Outputs: Clause 8.7 Guide

Implementing ISO 9001 control of nonconforming outputs enables quality managers to handle defective products effectively under ISO 9001:2015.

By 4Auditee6 min read
ISO 9001 Control of Nonconforming Outputs: Clause 8.7 Guide
On this page
  1. What the control of nonconforming outputs requirement is, and why it exists
  2. Step-by-step procedure for controlling nonconforming outputs
  3. Evaluating Clause 8.7 requirements against audit evidence
  4. Example
  5. Before your audit
  6. Questions people ask
  7. What is iso 9001 control of nonconforming outputs?
  8. How does an organisation handle defective products detected after delivery under ISO 9001?
  9. What is a concession under ISO 9001 Subclause 8.7.1?
  10. What documented information must be retained for nonconforming outputs?
  11. Reference documents

The short version

  • ISO 9001 control of nonconforming outputs ensures defective products and services are identified to prevent unintended delivery.
  • Subclause 8.7.1 allows handling nonconformities through correction, segregation, containment, customer notification, or obtaining concessions.
  • Re-verifying conformity is mandatory whenever nonconforming outputs are corrected prior to customer delivery or release.
  • Subclause 8.7.2 requires retaining documented information describing nonconformities, actions taken, concessions obtained, and authorizing authorities.

What the control of nonconforming outputs requirement is, and why it exists

Executing ISO 9001 control of nonconforming outputs requires organisations to ensure that products or services failing to meet specified requirements are systematically identified and controlled. Implementing ISO 9001 control of nonconforming outputs under the ISO 9001 standard prevents the unintended use, delivery, or processing of defective items. This requirement applies universally to all certified entities, whether providing tangible manufactured goods, digital software, or ongoing service provisions under Subclause 8.7.1.

The primary rationale for Clause 8.7 is safeguarding customer satisfaction and maintaining operational integrity across the supply chain. When an unmonitored defect bypasses operational checks, it threatens customer trust, causes financial loss, and can lead to severe regulatory noncompliance. Under Subclause 8.7.1, organisations must take appropriate action based on the nature of the nonconformity and its potential effect on overall conformity. This requirement applies both during internal production and after delivery or during service provision.

Under ISO 9001:2015, the verbal form "shall" indicates a mandatory requirement ("must"), whereas "may" indicates a permission ("may"). Organisations must establish operational mechanisms to deal with nonconforming outputs in one or more specified ways, including correction, segregation, containment, return, suspension, customer notification, or obtaining acceptance under concession. While organisations may select the most suitable combination of disposition actions, retaining detailed documented information under Subclause 8.7.2 remains strictly mandatory.

Important: Organisations must apply nonconformity controls to defective products and services detected after delivery or during service provision under Subclause 8.7.1.

Step-by-step procedure for controlling nonconforming outputs

Managing nonconforming outputs effectively requires compliance leads and shop floor supervisors to execute a standardized containment and disposition routine. Following a structured procedure prevents accidental mixing of conforming and nonconforming items across operational areas.

  • Identify and mark nonconforming outputs: Immediately apply physical tags, digital status flags, or hold labels to defective items upon detection under Subclause 8.5.2 and Subclause 8.7.1.
  • Execute segregation and containment: Move nonconforming physical products to designated quarantine holding areas or suspend service delivery under Subclause 8.7.1.b to prevent further processing or shipment.
  • Determine appropriate disposition action: Evaluate the defect severity and decide whether to perform correction, return items to external providers under Subclause 8.4.1, suspend provision, or seek acceptance under concession.
  • Obtain necessary concessions and customer notifications: Authorize acceptance under concession under Subclause 8.7.1.d if nonconforming outputs remain functionally safe, and inform the customer under Subclause 8.7.1.c if defects affect delivered items.
  • Re-verify corrected outputs: Conduct mandatory re-inspection and testing under Subclause 8.7.1 whenever nonconforming outputs undergo correction to confirm full compliance with acceptance criteria.
  • Retain documented evidence and evaluate root causes: Log defect descriptions, actions taken, concessions granted, and deciding authorities under Subclause 8.7.2, triggering corrective actions under Subclause 10.2.1 when necessary.

Tip: Clearly demarcate physical quarantine zones with restricted access permissions to prevent unauthorized removal of segregated defective stock.

Evaluating Clause 8.7 requirements against audit evidence

Auditors examine physical holding zones, digital tracking systems, and retained records to verify that nonconforming outputs are controlled rigorously. Organisations must present documented information demonstrating that unauthorized product release under Subclause 8.6 is strictly prevented.

RequirementWhat the auditor checksEvidence to have ready
Subclause 8.7.1 Identification and segregationHow nonconforming outputs are identified, tagged, quarantined, or suspended to prevent unintended deliveryPhysical quarantine logs, status identification tags, and digital hold flags
Subclause 8.7.1 Disposition and correctionWhether nonconforming outputs are handled via correction, return, containment, concession, or customer notificationDisposition authorization forms, return material logs, and customer communication records
Subclause 8.7.1 Post-correction verificationEvidence that corrected products or services are re-inspected against original acceptance criteria prior to releaseRe-inspection logs, secondary test reports, and quality sign-off records
Subclause 8.7.2 Retained documented informationWhether records describe nonconformities, actions taken, concessions obtained, and deciding authoritiesNonconformity reports, concession logs, and authorized sign-off registers

Common finding: Organisations frequently perform product rework or correction without retaining documented evidence of secondary verification required under Subclause 8.7.1.

Example

During a surveillance audit at an automotive stamping plant, an auditor reviewed Subclause 8.7.1 regarding the control of nonconforming outputs. The auditor observed three pallets of cracked metal brackets stored in an open production lane without identification tags or quarantine labels. A review of shop floor records revealed that production operators set aside the defective brackets but failed to log them in the nonconformity system or move them to a secure quarantine zone. Consequently, a forklift driver inadvertently moved two boxes from the unlabelled batch to the final packing line for customer shipment.

The compliance lead logged an immediate nonconformity under Subclause 10.2.1, halted shipment under Subclause 8.7.1.b, and re-inspected all packed containers. The plant updated its nonconformity procedure by establishing locked quarantine cages and training material handlers on mandatory status tagging under Subclause 8.5.2. When re-audited, the plant demonstrated complete segregation controls and presented verified nonconformity records under Subclause 8.7.2.

Note: Obtaining authorization for acceptance under concession under Subclause 8.7.1.d may require formal customer approval if contract terms mandate strict design specifications.

Before your audit

  • Confirm that physical quarantine areas are clearly identified, secured, and controlled under Subclause 8.7.1.
  • Verify that status identification tags or digital flags clearly distinguish nonconforming outputs under Subclause 8.5.2.
  • Ensure that all corrected products undergo documented re-verification prior to release under Subclause 8.7.1.
  • Retain documented information describing the nature of all nonconformities encountered under Subclause 8.7.2.a.
  • Check that records detail all actions taken, including containment, segregation, or returns, under Subclause 8.7.2.b.
  • Inspect concession records to verify proper authorization by designated internal authorities or customers under Subclause 8.7.2.c.
  • Retain documented information identifying the specific authority deciding the disposition action under Subclause 8.7.2.d.
  • Confirm that customer notifications are documented whenever nonconforming outputs are detected after delivery under Subclause 8.7.1.c.

Questions people ask

What is iso 9001 control of nonconforming outputs?

ISO 9001 control of nonconforming outputs is a mandatory process under Clause 8.7 that ensures defective products or services are identified and controlled. It prevents unintended use or delivery through segregation, correction, customer notification, or concession authorization.

How does an organisation handle defective products detected after delivery under ISO 9001?

Under Subclause 8.7.1, when defective products or services are detected after delivery or during service provision, the organisation must take action appropriate to the effect of the nonconformity. This includes informing the customer, containing further distribution, and executing corrective actions under Subclause 10.2.1.

What is a concession under ISO 9001 Subclause 8.7.1?

A concession under Subclause 8.7.1.d is formal authorization to use or release a product or service that does not conform to specified requirements. Concessions must be authorized by a relevant authority and, when applicable, by the customer, with records retained under Subclause 8.7.2.

What documented information must be retained for nonconforming outputs?

Under Subclause 8.7.2, organisations must retain documented information that describes the nonconformity, details the actions taken, and records any concessions obtained. These records must also identify the specific authorized person deciding the disposition action.

Reference documents

  • ISO 9001:2015 Quality management systems — Requirements
ShareLinkedInEmail

Manage this work in 4Auditee

Keep audit plans, problems, corrective actions and document versions in one place. See the records behind each change and decision.

Book a demo

Get new articles by email

Pick your topics. A short digest every Monday, or each new article as it is published.

You’ll get: ISO 9001 · ISO 9001 · Weekly digest

We email you a link to confirm. Nothing else is sent, and every email lets you unsubscribe. How we handle your address